Most people perform cardiovascular and strength training in
the same session because it seems to achieve multiple goals at the same time.
Yet scientists and trainers continue to ask whether or not this approach really
achieves multiple goals or is, in fact, counterproductive. The answer seems to
lie in the fact that our muscles are smart—they know the difference between
cardiovascular, strength and flexibility work.
Muscles get confused (just like you and I sometimes do). If
you walk into a yoga studio ready to do yoga, but the room is filled with
indoor cycles, you get confused. Muscles are the same way. When you combine
strength and cardio in the same session, your muscles get confused at the
molecular level. The molecular mechanisms associated with gains can cancel each
other out, which will diminish your results.
It is widely accepted that combined training adversely
impacts strength, but not endurance. Therefore, we will look at ways to program
to overcome muscle confusion and achieve strength gains, while not forgetting
about cardiovascular and flexibility training. The primary programming factors
for you to consider are length of recovery time after strength training, and
the frequency, type, intensity and volume of endurance training.
Recovery Time
Muscles need 48 hours for baseline strength
to recover from high-intensity strength training. This finding is based on data
collected from knee extensor torque (KET), which showed that KET and muscle
force-generation capacity (MFGC; strength and power measurement) were
compromised up to two days after high-intensity strength training on
alternating days (Doma and Deakin, 2013). The data
shows us that full recovery from high-intensity strength training (typically
defined as 85% or higher of 1RM max) requires at least 48 hours of rest.
Frequency
Based on what we saw above on recovery, if you design a
program that includes both muscle strength and endurance goals, it is best to
schedule each type of exercise on alternate days. Other programming
suggestions include limiting endurance-training frequency to fewer than
three days per week to minimize the effects on strength (Wilson
et al., 2012).
Type of Cardiovascular Exercise
Frequency and recovery aside, the type of cardio exercise
you choose is critical, along with the intensity and volume of it. Independent
research shows, for example, that running combined with strength training
results in greater strength loss than cycling combined with strength training (Doma and Deakin, 2013). Consequently, it is recommended
to include cycling in combined training programs versus running where
strength is the primary goal.
Intensity
Another important research finding that will influence your
programming is that the extent of strength impairment is directly related to
the intensity of the endurance training (Jones et al., 2017; Wilson et al.,
2012). Specifically, moderate- to high-intensity endurance training
reduced the effectiveness of strength training. Therefore, the intensity of
endurance sessions should be decreased to limit the negative impact on strength
gains. However, practical considerations and training goals will influence the
utility of low-intensity endurance training sessions. In other words,
low-intensity endurance training sessions may not negatively impact strength
gains, but are they useful to reaching your client’s overall fitness goals? The
periodic frequency of moderate- to high-intensity sessions might be warranted
and should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Volume
Finally, it is recommended that endurance training
sessions last between 20 and 30 minutes to minimize the negative
effects of volume or amount of endurance training on strength gains (Jones et
al., 2017).
Key Programming Points
A summary of suggested programming guidelines are provided
below. Note that these apply to a combined training program where the primary
goal is strength gains.
References
Doma, K. and Deakin, G. (2013). The cumulative effects of
strength and endurance training sessions on muscle force generation capacity
over four days. Journal of Australian Strength and Conditioning,
21(Supplement 1), 34-38.
Jones, T.W. et al. (2017).
Effects of strength and endurance exercise order on endocrine responses to
concurrent training. European Journal of Sports Sciences, 17, 3, 326-334.
Wilson, J.M., et al. (2012). Concurrent training: A
meta-analysis examining interference of aerobic and resistance exercises. Journal
of Strength and Conditioning Research, 26, 8, 2293-2307.
AUTHOR
Amy
Ashmore
Contributor
Amy Ashmore holds a Ph.D. in Kinesiology from the University
of Texas at Austin. She has over 30 years of sports & fitness industry and
academic leadership experience. Amy is the former Program Director for Sports
Sciences and Management at the American Military University (AMU) and has been
a Professor at American Public University System, University of Tampa, and
College of Southern Nevada. Amy has delivered over 250 presentations to
academia, business, and industry. She is the author of dozens of articles and
blogs and three books that have reached over 500,000 fitness professionals in
80 countries. Amy lives in Las Vegas, Nevada with her son, Aiden, and their
dog, Jimbug.